China Laws Portal - CJO

Find China's laws and official public documents in English

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

British Broadcasting Corporation v. Beijing Iyuba Technology Co., Ltd. (2020)

北京爱语吧科技有限公司二审民事判决书

Court Beijing Intellectual Property Court

Case number 2020 Jin 73 Min Zhong No.1557 ((2020)京73民终1557号)

Date of the decision Oct 29, 2020

Court Level Specialized Court

Trial procedure Second instance

Types of Litigation Civil Litigation

Type of cases Case

Topic(s) Intellectual Property Trademark Law

Editor(s) C. J. Observer

On 25 Nov. 2020, Beijing Intellectual Property Court ruled in the second instance that the use of word “BBC English” and relevant logos by Beijing Iyuba Technology Co., Ltd. (“Iyuba”) infringed upon the exclusive right to use trademarks of the British Broadcasting Corporation (“BBC”) and constituted unfair competition.

In its judgment, Beijing Intellectual Property Court held that the use of word “BBC English” and relevant logos in a prominent place on the homepage and relevant columns of its website by Iyuba is not merely a descriptive use to indicate the source of contents, but the use of “BBC English” for commercial purpose. As “BBC” is the distinctive part in words, logos, such as the “BBC English” used by Iyuba, the overall visual effect is similar to the BBC trademark in dispute, and Iyuba also provide similar services to the services for which the BBC trademark is approved to be used, it is easy to cause the public to mistakenly believe that the goods and services provided by Iyuba had a specific association with BBC, so it constitutes an infringement of the trademark in dispute.

The BBC is mainly engaged in news broadcasting, television and other industries, but also provides English-language teaching materials such as audio, video and text materials. Iyuba competes with the BBC by offering English-language content such as listening and reading materials on its website, WeChat official accounts and mobile apps, etc. The act of Iyuba involved in this case easily causes people to mistaken it for the service provided by the BBC or mistaken that Iyuba has a specific association with BBC, which constitutes confusion of “unauthorized use of another influential enterprise name (including its abbreviation, trade name, etc.)” as specified in Article 6 (2) of the Anti-unfair Competition Law.

For the full text in Chinese, please click the “Chn” at the top right. You can translate it with tools or in other ways as you please.
If you would like to read the full text in English provided by our team, please click Get to buy.

© 2020 Guodong Du and Meng Yu. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of the content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Guodong Du and Meng Yu.