China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Alibaba Fined CNY 18.2 Billion for Anti-Monopoly Violations

Mon, 10 May 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 10 Apr. 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), pursuant to the PRC Anti-monopoly Law, imposed an administrative penalty on Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. (hereinafter the “Alibaba Group”) for its abuse of market dominance in China’s services market involving online retail platforms, ordering Alibaba Group to stop its illegal activities and pay a fine of CNY 18.228 billion(USD 2.8 billion), which was equal to 4% of its domestic revenues in 2019 (CNY 455.712 billion).

Alibaba Group enjoys market dominance in the market of online retail platform service providers in China. Since 2015, Alibaba Group has been abusing its market dominance, requiring the business operators to accept its policy, “choose one from two”. According to this policy, business operators on Alibaba’s platform are prohibited from opening stores or participating in promotional activities on other competitive platforms. Moreover, a variety of reward and punishment measures are taken to ensure the implementation of such policy.

Such activities of Alibaba Group eliminates and restricts competition in the market of online retail platform service providers in China, impedes the free flow of goods, services and resources, affects the innovation and development of platform economy, infringes upon the legitimate rights and interests of business operators on the platform, and harms the interests of consumers as well. It thus constitutes an abuse of market dominance by “requiring the other party to the transaction to trade exclusively with it without justifiable reasons” as specified in subparagraph 1(4) of Article 17 of the PRC Anti-Monopoly Law.

While making the decision on administrative penalty in accordance with the PRC Administrative Penalty Law, the SAMR has issued the Administrative Guidelines to Alibaba Group, requiring it to adopt comprehensive ratification measures, such as regulating its own competitive behaviors, assuming the responsibilities as a platform service provider, strengthening the internal control and compliance management, and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of business operators and consumers on the platforms, etc., and to submit self-inspection and compliance reports to the SAMR for three consecutive years.

 

 

Cover Photo by viarami (https://pixabay.com/users/viarami-13458823/) on Pixabay

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.

SPC’s 2024 Typical IP Cases Include AI Face-Swap Ruling

In April 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court released eight typical IP cases, highlighting judicial responses to emerging issues in AI, gaming, and biotech, including a landmark ruling on AI face-swapping copyright infringement.