In 2019, the Chinese courts have heard a total of 30 cases concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
Recognizing and Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in China
When it comes to the stage of recognition and enforcement, limitation period is a decisive factor but can be easily ignored by the winning parties.
How would Chinese courts view arbitral awards where foreign tribunals reject a force majeure claim connected to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic?
China Refuses to Recognize a Foreign Arbitral Award on the Grounds of Public Policy for the 2nd Time in 10 Years
On the grounds of public policy, the Tianjin Maritime Court refused to enforce an arbitral award made in London on 1st July 2018.
How will Chinese Courts Review the Arbitral Awards Made by Foreign Arbitration Institutions in Mainland China?
On what basis would Chinese courts examine the arbitral awards made by foreign arbitration institutions in mainland China, the New York Convention or Chinese domestic law? The answer is the latter.
How do Chinese courts view public policy in judicial review of arbitration? Judge Song Jianli (宋建立) from the Supreme People’s Court expresses his views on that.
In 2018, Chinese courts have heard a total of 25 cases in relation to recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
We are endeavoring to collect all Chinese court decisions involving the recognition and enforcement of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation (ICAC, Международный коммерческий арбитражный суд) arbitral awards.