China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Apostille Convention Comes into Effect in China

Thu, 25 Jan 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 7 Nov. 2023, the 1961 Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents (Apostille Convention) came into effect in China.

The Apostille Convention is the international treaty with the widest application and the largest number of contracting members under the Hague Conference on Private International Law(HCCH). It aims to simplify procedures for cross-border circulation of public documents.

Upon the Apostille Convention’s entry into force on 7 Nov. 2023, China will be exempted from the formalities for consular legalization with 125 countries.

This means that foreign-related public documents sent from China to the aforementioned countries will only require an apostille issued by the Department of Consular Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or an authorized local foreign affairs office. Public documents sent from these countries to China will also no longer require legalization (consular authentication) by the local Chinese Consulate.

For example, the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco issued a notice stating:

  • Public documents within the scope of the Convention issued by the U.S. only need to apply for a U.S. apostille before they can be sent to Chinese mainland for use. There is no need to apply for consular authentication by the U.S. and the Chinese Embassy and Consulates-General in the U.S.
  • Public documents sent from China to the U.S. within the scope of the Convention will no longer require consular authentication by China and the U.S. consulates in China, but will instead be processed with apostilles.

 

 

Photo by Nathan Cima on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.