China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing Court Issues Guidelines on Application of Punitive Damages in Trial of Intellectual Property Cases

Mon, 13 Jun 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 25 Apr. 2022, Beijing High People’s Court issued the “Guidelines on the Application of Punitive Damages in the Trial of Intellectual Property Infringement Civil Cases” (关于侵害知识产权民事案件适用惩罚性赔偿审理指南, hereinafter “the Trial Guidelines”) and typical cases of punitive damages.

The Trial Guidelines clarifies that punitive damages shall apply to cases in which intellectual property rights are infringed intentionally and the circumstances are serious, and are subject to the request of the right holders.

For a long time, claims for punitive damages by right holders against infringers were not supported under Chinese law. In the last three years, however, there has been a relaxation of Chinese law, particularly in the area of intellectual property law. The Copyright Law, Trademark Law, and Patent Law all support punitive damages.

The Trial Guidelines issued by the Beijing High People’s Court has provided a more stable expectation for right holders to claim for punitive damages.

Specifically, punitive damages include the compensation for the infringed person’s losses and the punitive damages. The Trial Guidelines clarifies that the total amount of punitive damages shall be the sum of the base number and the base number multiplied by the multiple, and refines the method of determining the base number and the multiple.

 

 

Cover Photo by Eric Prouzet on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.