China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing International Commercial Court Issues Guidelines for Application of HCCH 1961 Apostille Convention

Wed, 17 Apr 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

In order to help parties in better understand how Chinese courts will apply the HCCH 1961 Apostille Convention, the Beijing International Commercial Court (BICC) has prepared the “Understanding and Application Guidelines for the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents” (《取消外国公文书认证要求的公约》理解适用诉讼指引, hereinafter the “Guidelines”).

On 8 Mar. 2023, China acceded to the “Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents” (hereinafter the “Convention”), which entered into force for China on 7 Nov. 2023. However, many parties are not familiar with how the courts will apply this Convention, hence the BICC has prepared the Guidelines.

The highlights of the Guidelines are as follows.

  • Apostille applies for contracting states to the Convention, and consular authentication applies for non-contracting states to the Convention.
  • In cases where the authenticity of Apostille certificates provided by parties cannot be confirmed during trials, the matter may be referred to the International Cooperation Department of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC).
  • If any treaty concluded between China and other states requires more simplified certification procedures for signatures or seals compared to those in the Convention, such treaty shall prevail. By the same token, if the procedures are more stringent than those in the Convention, the Convention shall prevail.
  • The certificate supports online verification. For details, please log on to the Legalization/Apostille Verification System (https://consular.mfa.gov.cn/VERIFY/)

The BICC is the second local international commercial court established in China and is subordinate to the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People’s Court.

 

Photo by zhang kaiyv on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)