China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing International Commercial Court Issues Guidelines for Application of HCCH 1961 Apostille Convention

Wed, 17 Apr 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

In order to help parties in better understand how Chinese courts will apply the HCCH 1961 Apostille Convention, the Beijing International Commercial Court (BICC) has prepared the “Understanding and Application Guidelines for the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents” (《取消外国公文书认证要求的公约》理解适用诉讼指引, hereinafter the “Guidelines”).

On 8 Mar. 2023, China acceded to the “Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents” (hereinafter the “Convention”), which entered into force for China on 7 Nov. 2023. However, many parties are not familiar with how the courts will apply this Convention, hence the BICC has prepared the Guidelines.

The highlights of the Guidelines are as follows.

  • Apostille applies for contracting states to the Convention, and consular authentication applies for non-contracting states to the Convention.
  • In cases where the authenticity of Apostille certificates provided by parties cannot be confirmed during trials, the matter may be referred to the International Cooperation Department of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC).
  • If any treaty concluded between China and other states requires more simplified certification procedures for signatures or seals compared to those in the Convention, such treaty shall prevail. By the same token, if the procedures are more stringent than those in the Convention, the Convention shall prevail.
  • The certificate supports online verification. For details, please log on to the Legalization/Apostille Verification System (https://consular.mfa.gov.cn/VERIFY/)

The BICC is the second local international commercial court established in China and is subordinate to the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People’s Court.

 

Photo by zhang kaiyv on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.