China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing International Commercial Court Issues Guidelines for Application of HCCH 1961 Apostille Convention

Wed, 17 Apr 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

In order to help parties in better understand how Chinese courts will apply the HCCH 1961 Apostille Convention, the Beijing International Commercial Court (BICC) has prepared the “Understanding and Application Guidelines for the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents” (《取消外国公文书认证要求的公约》理解适用诉讼指引, hereinafter the “Guidelines”).

On 8 Mar. 2023, China acceded to the “Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents” (hereinafter the “Convention”), which entered into force for China on 7 Nov. 2023. However, many parties are not familiar with how the courts will apply this Convention, hence the BICC has prepared the Guidelines.

The highlights of the Guidelines are as follows.

  • Apostille applies for contracting states to the Convention, and consular authentication applies for non-contracting states to the Convention.
  • In cases where the authenticity of Apostille certificates provided by parties cannot be confirmed during trials, the matter may be referred to the International Cooperation Department of China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC).
  • If any treaty concluded between China and other states requires more simplified certification procedures for signatures or seals compared to those in the Convention, such treaty shall prevail. By the same token, if the procedures are more stringent than those in the Convention, the Convention shall prevail.
  • The certificate supports online verification. For details, please log on to the Legalization/Apostille Verification System (https://consular.mfa.gov.cn/VERIFY/)

The BICC is the second local international commercial court established in China and is subordinate to the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People’s Court.

 

Photo by zhang kaiyv on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.