China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing Internet Court Publishes Personal Information Protection Cases

Wed, 18 Dec 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 30 Oct. 2024, the Beijing Internet Court (BIC) released an overview of its handling of personal information protection cases over the past year, along with eight typical cases.

From October 2023 to October 2024, the BIC accepted 113 cases of personal information protection disputes and concluded 104 cases, showing a growing trend. In comparison, in the five years from 2018 to 2023, the BIC accepted 58 such cases, indicating a significant increase in the number of cases handled over the past year.

In terms of the infringers, internet companies were defendants in 95 cases, accounting for over 80%. Regarding the types of information involved, 81 cases (approximately 70%) concerned registration information such as names, ID numbers, and phone numbers, while 23 cases (about 20%) involved biometric data such as  facial recognition.

The primary types of infringement included the collection, disclosure, or provision of personal information without consent. For example, some offline retailers provided users’ transaction data to online mini-program operators without user consent. Additionally, some online platforms, as personal information processors, failed to fulfill their legal obligations to ensure user data security, resulting in information leaks, alterations, or misuse.

The BIC is responsible for centrally handling Internet-related personal information protection cases within Beijing that fall under the jurisdiction of primary people’s courts.

 

 

Photo by Nathan Cima on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.