China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Intensifies Crackdown on Non-Compliance with Court Judgments

Tue, 06 Jan 2026
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 10 June 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC), Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued the “Opinions on Handling Criminal Cases of Refusing to Comply with Judgments and Rulings” (关于办理拒不执行判决、裁定刑事案件若干问题的意见, hereinafter the “Opinions”), which took effect on 1 July 2025.

The Opinions clarify the specific responsibilities of the judiciary, police, and procuratorates in tackling these offenses of refusing to enforce judgments or rulings. Courts that identify suspected cases of non-compliance must transfer the relevant evidence to public security organs for investigation. Police are required to decide whether to formally open a case within seven days, a deadline that can be extended to 30 days for major or complex matters. Meanwhile, procuratorates are tasked with supervising the filing process and initiating public prosecutions. The guidelines also empower applicants (judgment creditors) to file private criminal lawsuits if they can provide evidence that a judgment debtor is intentionally defying a court order.

The Opinions builds upon a Judicial Interpretation that came into effect on 1 Dec. 2024, which sought to address China’s long-standing problem of “difficult enforcement” by refining the legal criteria.

Related Post:

Statistics show that in 2023, courts nationwide concluded 9.76 million enforcement cases, with 4,246 offenders convicted of refusal-to-comply crimes. From January to October 2024, the number of offenders rose to 5,289, revealing China’s determination to intensify the crackdown.

 

Photo by Joshua Fernandez on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.