China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Xiamen Launches Personal Bankruptcy Law, First Case Filed

Thu, 15 Jan 2026
Categories: China Legal Trends
Editor: C. J. Observer

Xiamen's People's Congress passed the Personal Bankruptcy Protection Regulations for the Xiamen Special Economic Zone (“厦门经济特区个人破产保护条例”) on 26 Aug. 2025, with the law taking effect on November 1. This marks the second local personal bankruptcy law in mainland China, following Shenzhen's similar measure that began in March 2021. The legislation aims to fill a long-standing gap in China’s legal system by providing a path for insolvent individuals to reorganize their finances or seek a fresh start.

The law applies to individuals who have lived or operated businesses in Xiamen for at least five consecutive years. If they cannot repay due debts and lack sufficient assets, they may seek reorganization, settlement, or liquidation. Creditors with claims totaling more than five times the city's previous year's per capita disposable income for residents can also initiate applications.

A core tenet of the law is the protection of "honest but unfortunate" debtors. It introduces an exempt asset system, allowing individuals to retain property necessary for basic living and professional development. Additionally, the law provides for the discharge of remaining debts after a designated observation period and includes a specialized chapter on credit restoration. To curb malicious debt evasion, it sets up a public bankruptcy information platform, integrity checks, and stiffer penalties for fraud, including fines or criminal charges for false asset declarations. It also introduces special procedures like pre-court debt resolution, inheritance bankruptcy, and joint spousal bankruptcy, while streamlining reorganization-to-liquidation transitions and cutting costs.

The first application under the new law was recorded on 3 Nov. 2025 by the Xiamen Intermediate People’s Court. The applicant is the founder of a nationally certified high-tech Internet of Things (IoT) firm who faced financial collapse due to pandemic-related disruptions and heightened market competition. After their personal assets and those of their spouse were seized for debt repayment, they sought relief through the new legal framework. The court is currently reviewing the materials and will issue a ruling on the case following a mandatory public notification period.

Mainland China has historically lacked a personal bankruptcy framework. Xiamen's law borrows from the national Enterprise Bankruptcy Law and Shenzhen's model to balance creditor and debtor interests and enable economic recovery for debtors.

 

 

Photo by Woo Winter on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)