China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing IP Court Guidelines: Certifying Subject Qualification Documents

Thu, 11 Apr 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 19 Dec. 2023, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court issued the Guidelines for Handling Supporting Documents Certifying the Subject Qualification in Foreign-related Cases. The Guidelines is available in both Chinese and English.

The Guidelines explains in detail the authentication procedures for relevant documents in combination with the relevant contents of the Convention on the Abolition of Requirements for the Authentication of Foreign Public Documents that came into effect in China on November 7, 2023. Furthermore, practical opinions from such institutions as the Beijing Lawyers Association, the All China Lawyers Association, the All-China Patent Attorneys Association, CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office, and China Patent Agent (H.K) Ltd were referenced during the compilation of the Guidelines.

The Guidelines primarily covers the guidelines for handling such supporting documents in six countries in Asia, Europe, and the Americas.

The Guidelines can neither encompass all countries and regions nor provide all forms of supporting documents for the subject's qualification. Therefore, parties concerned in and attorneys for foreign-related cases may still submit to the court documents in other forms, provided that such documents are authentic and valid and can prove the subject qualification.

Beijing Intellectual Property Court indicated that they will keep refining and supplementing the Guidelines based on the practical experience in hearing foreign-related cases and opinions and suggestions from various sources.

 

 

Photo by 天琦 王 on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)