China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Adjusts Regulatory Rules on After-school Tutoring Institutions

Wed, 07 Jun 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 14 Mar. 2023, five Chinese departments, including the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, and the General Administration of Sport, jointly promulgated the “Interim Measures for Financial Management of After-school Tutoring Institutions” (hereinafter the “Measures”, 校外培训机构财务管理暂行办法).

The Measures applies to after-school tutoring institutions which provide after-school training for preschool children (aged 3 to 6), primary and secondary school students.

The Measures adjusts the regulatory policies in 2021.

In 2021, China issued the “Opinions on Further Reducing Students’ Homework Burden and After-school Tutoring Burden in Compulsory Education” (hereinafter the “2021 Opinions”, 关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生作业负担和校外培训负担的意见). This 2021 Opinions stipulates that (1) after-school tutoring institutions are uniformly registered as non-profit institutions (which means they may not pay dividends to investors); (2) none of them may be listed to raise capital; (3) listed companies may not invest in such institutions through stock market financing; and (4) foreign investors may not take controlling or non-controlling interests in such institutions by mergers and acquisitions, trusteeship, franchise chains, VIEs, or any other means.

The 2021 Opinions has severely impacted for-profit after-school tutoring institutions in China, especially those already listed in China and the United States.

The 2023 Measures allows the operation of for-profit after-school tutoring institutions, in other words, investors may obtain dividends from such institutions. However, the Measures still rejects listed companies and foreign investors from investing in such institutions.

 

 

Cover Photo by Michelle Liu on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.