China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Amends Civil Procedure Law with Focus on Online Litigation

Sat, 22 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 Dec. 2021, the Standing Committee of the 13th National People’s Congress of China approved amendments to the PRC Civil Procedure Law (CPL). The new CPL came into effect on 1 Jan. 2022.

The CPL amendments mainly touch upon judicial confirmation procedures, small-amount litigation procedures, summary procedures, single-judge trials, online litigation, etc. The amendments add seven new articles, and revise 26 articles, and 13 of which are changed to be consistent with the expressions of the Civil Code.

The core of the new CPL is to improve the efficiency of litigation in order to alleviate the litigation explosion currently faced by Chinese courts.

Among others, the amendments focus on online litigation. For example, it stipulates that:

  1. civil proceeding activities conducted through online litigation shall have the same legal effect as civil proceeding activities conducted offline;
  2. subject to the consent by all parties concerned, civil proceedings can be conducted online through an information platform; and,
  3. subject to the consent of the person to be served, the people's court may serve the document by electronic means if it can confirm the receipt thereof by the person being served.

 

 

Cover Photo by Kenneth Yang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)