China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Amends Rules on Review of Concentrations of Undertakings

Mon, 29 May 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 10 Mar. 2023, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) issued the amended Provisions on the Review of Concentrations of Undertakings (hereinafter the “Provisions”, 经营者集中审查规定).

This amendment comes only one year after China amended the Provisions in March 2022.7 Among others, the following points are noteworthy.

  • According to the Provisions amended in 2022, SAMR shall treat all operators equally when conducting anti-monopoly reviews of concentrations of undertakings. However, the Provisions amended in 2023 deleted the phrase of “treat equally” and replaced it with “classified and graded review”. It also provides that SAMR may separately formulate specific review measures for the concentrations of undertakings in important fields related to the national economy and people’s livelihood, etc., which means that new rules allow for the concentrations of undertakings in certain fields.
  • In order to reduce the actual or potential effect of a concentration in eliminating or limiting competition, the parties involved in the concentration may submit to the SAMR a proposal for commitments to impose a restriction, including behavioral restrictions such as (i) granting access to a network, a platform, or any other infrastructure; (ii) licensing a key technology (including patents, proprietary technologies, and other intellectual property); (iii) terminating an exclusive or monopolistic agreement; (iv) maintaining independent operations; (v) modifying platform rules or algorithms; and (vi) undertaking to be compatible or not to reduce the level of interoperability.
  • The Provisions amended in 2023 added regulation of anti-monopoly enforcement officer, which provided that employees of anti-monopoly law enforcement institutions who abuse their power, neglects their duties, engage in malpractices for personal benefits, or divulge trade secrets, personal privacy, or personal information known during law enforcement will be punished.

 

 

Cover Photo by Zetton Zhang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.