China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Amends Wildlife Protection Law

Mon, 16 Jan 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 30 Dec. 2022, China’s legislature, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC) revised the “Wildlife Protection Law” (野生动物保护法).

The Law was enacted in 1988 and amended in 2009, 2016, 2018, and 2022.

Related Post:

The noteworthy provisions in the Law are as follows:

  1. Wild animals refer to the rare and endangered species of terrestrial and aquatic wild animals and the terrestrial wild animals of significant ecological, scientific, or social value.
  2. The general public shall prevent the spread of wild animal-borne infectious diseases and resist the illegal eating of wild animals.
  3. The people’s governments at or above the provincial level shall include important habitats of wild animals in national parks, nature reserves, and other natural protected areas.
  4. The monitoring and quarantine of the epidemic sources and epidemic diseases of wild animals as well as prevention and control of infectious diseases of animals related to anthropozoonosis shall be governed by the provisions of the Animal Epidemic Prevention Law (动物防疫法) and other relevant laws and regulations.
  5. It is prohibited to provide unique genetic resources of wild animals in China to overseas institutions or personnel. Where international scientific research cooperation is conducted, approval shall be obtained in accordance with the law.
  6. The introduction of any species of wild animals from abroad shall be subject to the approval of the competent department of wild animal conservation of the State Council.

 

 

Cover Photo by Chris Stenger on Unsplash

 
 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.