China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Continues to Strengthen Regulation on Off-Campus Tutoring Industry

Fri, 17 Dec 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 3 Nov. 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation and other seven authorities jointly issued the “Notice of Effectively Controlling Off-Campus Tutoring Advertisements” (hereinafter “the Notice”, 关于做好校外培训广告管控的通知) to strengthen control of off-campus tutoring advertisements.

The Notice clarifies stricter regular control on off-campus tutoring advertisements. The off-campus advertisements will be included as an important part of the qualification management of off-campus tutors.

In terms of media management, it specifies more effective governance on off-campus tutoring advertisements to tackle disguised off-campus advertisements in the form of TV programs or columns and sponsored content.

Earlier this year, China imposed extremely stringent regulation on the off-campus tutoring industry by promulgating the “Opinions on Further Reducing Burden of Excessive Homework and Off-campus Tutoring for Students Undergoing Compulsory Education”(hereinafter “the Opinions”, 关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生作业负担和校外培训负担的意见) in July.

The regulation of advertisements in this industry is also part of wider efforts to implement the Opinions.

 

 

Cover Photo by Night Glow on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)