China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Eases Restrictions for Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises

Wed, 18 May 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 7 Apr. 2022, the State Council issued a relevant decision to make substantial amendments to the “Provisions on Administration of Foreign-invested Telecommunications Enterprises” (hereinafter “the Provisions on Administration”, 外商投资电信企业管理规定), which came into effect on 1 May 2022.

The new Provisions on Administration simplifies the original 23 articles into 17 articles, revises definition of “foreign-invested telecommunications enterprises” in Article 2 into “enterprises lawfully established by foreign investors within the territory of the People’s Republic of China to provide telecommunications services”, and deletes the expressions like “Sino-foreign equity joint venture”. Such revision makes the relevant concepts and expressions in Provisions on Administration consistent with those in the Foreign Investment Law.

Provisions on Administration further relaxes the restrictions on foreign equity ratio.

It provides that “The ultimate proportion of capital contribution made by foreign investors in a foreign-invested telecommunications enterprise providing basic telecommunications services (excluding radio paging services) shall not exceed 49%, except as otherwise provided by the state. The ultimate proportion of capital contribution made by foreign investors in a foreign-invested telecommunications enterprise providing value-added telecommunications services (including basic telecommunications services in the radio paging services) shall not exceed 50%, except as otherwise provided by the state.”

Prior to that, there was no such exception clause. This opens up the possibility for the Chinese government to relax restrictions on foreign investors in the telecommunications services.

 

 

Cover Photo by Xu Duo on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)