China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Eases Restrictions for Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises

Wed, 18 May 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 7 Apr. 2022, the State Council issued a relevant decision to make substantial amendments to the “Provisions on Administration of Foreign-invested Telecommunications Enterprises” (hereinafter “the Provisions on Administration”, 外商投资电信企业管理规定), which came into effect on 1 May 2022.

The new Provisions on Administration simplifies the original 23 articles into 17 articles, revises definition of “foreign-invested telecommunications enterprises” in Article 2 into “enterprises lawfully established by foreign investors within the territory of the People’s Republic of China to provide telecommunications services”, and deletes the expressions like “Sino-foreign equity joint venture”. Such revision makes the relevant concepts and expressions in Provisions on Administration consistent with those in the Foreign Investment Law.

Provisions on Administration further relaxes the restrictions on foreign equity ratio.

It provides that “The ultimate proportion of capital contribution made by foreign investors in a foreign-invested telecommunications enterprise providing basic telecommunications services (excluding radio paging services) shall not exceed 49%, except as otherwise provided by the state. The ultimate proportion of capital contribution made by foreign investors in a foreign-invested telecommunications enterprise providing value-added telecommunications services (including basic telecommunications services in the radio paging services) shall not exceed 50%, except as otherwise provided by the state.”

Prior to that, there was no such exception clause. This opens up the possibility for the Chinese government to relax restrictions on foreign investors in the telecommunications services.

 

 

Cover Photo by Xu Duo on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Beyond the Memorandum: Shanghai Court Enforces Singapore Judgment by Confirming “Reciprocal Consensus” Under China’s New Framework

On January 8, 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court recognized and enforced a Singapore High Court monetary judgment in Zhao v Ye (2023) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No. 28. It marks the first judicial confirmation of “reciprocal consensus” between China and Singapore under the 2022 reciprocity criteria, based on the China-Singapore Memorandum of Guidance (MOG).

SPC Issues New Rules for Government Information Disclosure Cases

In May 2025, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a new judicial interpretation, replacing its 2011 predecessor to standardize adjudication of government information disclosure cases and safeguard citizens' right to know by clarifying trial standards, defendant identification, burden of proof, and preventive relief.

China's Top Court Releases Minor Protection Cases

China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released five typical cases to strengthen holistic judicial protection for minors, exemplifying the "best interests of the child" principle through integrated criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings.

China Enacts Landmark Private Economy Promotion Law

China enacted its landmark first Private Economy Promotion Law, effective May 20, 2025, to guarantee fair competition, streamline market access via a unified negative list, and bolster private enterprises through financing, innovation, and service support.

China Strengthens Criminal IP Protection with New Rules

In April 2025, China’s top court and procuratorate jointly issued a new judicial interpretation to clarify standards for handling criminal intellectual property infringement cases, aiming to strengthen IP protection, particularly in the service sector.

SPC’s 2024 Typical IP Cases Include AI Face-Swap Ruling

In April 2025, China’s Supreme People’s Court released eight typical IP cases, highlighting judicial responses to emerging issues in AI, gaming, and biotech, including a landmark ruling on AI face-swapping copyright infringement.