China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Enhances Review and Filing System for Laws and Regulations

Wed, 05 Jun 2024
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 30 Dec. 2023, the Standing Committee of China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) issued the “Decision on Improving and Strengthening the Filing and Review System” (hereinafter the “Decision”, 关于完善和加强备案审查制度的决定) to enhance its mechanism for reviewing and filing of laws and regulations.

The NPC is responsible for reviewing and filing laws and regulations to rectify and revoke normative documents that violate the Constitution and laws.

In accordance with the Decision, normative documents to be reviewed and filed by the NPC include administrative regulations, supervisory regulations, local regulations, autonomous regulations and separate regulations of autonomous prefectures and counties, regulations of special economic zones, regulations of Pudong New Area, regulations of Hainan Free Trade Port, as well as interpretations made by the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on the specific application of law in trial or procuratorial work.

 

 

Photo by Weichao Deng on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.