China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Imposes Administrative Penalty against Didi for Cybersecurity

Mon, 29 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 21 July 2022, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) fined Didi Global (hereinafter “Didi”) CNY 8.026 billion and two Didi executives – CEO Cheng Wei and president Liu Qing – CNY 1 million apiece.

In July 2021, the CAC launched an investigation on Didi’s cybersecurity practices and then, based on the issues and clues found in the investigation, filed a case against Didi for the company’s alleged violations.

Didi was founded in January 2013 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange on 30 June 2021. Its principal businesses include online ride-hailing and ride-sharing services.

According to the CAC, Didi had committed a total of 16 violations.

For one thing, Didi had excessively collected personal information and compulsorily collected sensitive personal information. More precisely, it had illegally collected screenshots, copy-and-paste content, and lists of installed apps from users’ phones and excessively gathered passengers’ facial recognition data, ages, occupations, and interpersonal relationships, as well as drivers’ educational background and personal identity information, etc.

For another, Didi failed to fulfill its obligation to inform users about its processing of their personal information. It had analyzed passengers’ travel intentions without explicitly informing them and failed to clarify what it had done with users’ device data and other 18 items of personal information.

The above-mentioned actions violated China’s Cybersecurity Law, Data Security Law, and Personal Information Protection Law.

 

 

Cover Photo by Cheng Huang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)