China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues First Family Education Order

Thu, 07 Apr 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 2 Mar. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released nine typical cases on judicial protection of minors’ rights and interests. In one of the cases, a Chinese court issued China’s first family education order.

In the case of Hu v. Chen, a dispute over the change of child custody, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit after the defendant, as the child’s custodial parent, failed to send the child to school in accordance with the divorce agreement. In accordance with the Family Education Promotion Law (家庭教育促进法), the court issued China’s first family education order to the defendant.

The Family Education Promotion Law was adopted on 23 Oct. 2021 and came into effect from 1 Jan. 2022.

This is China’s first special law for family education. It requires that parents should strengthen parent-child companionship and cooperate with each other in fulfilling their family education responsibilities, even when the parents of minors are separated or divorced.

In this case, the Chinese court required the parents to fulfill their guardianship duties in accordance with the law.

 

 

Cover Photo by Jéan Béller on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)