China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Guidelines on Advertising Terms

Mon, 22 May 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 25 Feb. 2023, China’s State Administration of Market Regulation (SAMR) issued the “Guidelines for Law Enforcement of Absolute Terms in Advertising” (hereinafter the “Guidelines”, 广告绝对化用语执法指南).

Advertisers often use words such as “the best”, “the fastest”, “the highest” and “the most delicious” to promote their products when designing their advertising copy.

However, starting in 2018, such expressions are prohibited under China’s Advertising Law. Article 9 thereof prohibits advertisements containing expressions such as “national”, “highest level” and “the best”.

Since then, a large number of Chinese advertisers have been imposed administrative penalties under this rule. For a long time, advertisers can only guess the enforcement standards of law enforcement agencies through hearsay law enforcement cases. Even more, many legal technology companies have developed advertisement review software to help advertisers self-censor.

The Guidelines issued by SAMR will assist advertisers in rationally designing their advertising copy.

 

 

Cover Photo by Matze Bob on Unsplash

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.