China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Guiding Opinions on Implementation of RCEP

Thu, 03 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 Jan. 2022, China’s Ministry of Commerce and five other ministries jointly issued the “Guiding Opinions on the High-Quality Implementation of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)” (hereinafter “the Opinions”, 关于高质量实施<区域全面经济伙伴关系协定>的指导意见).

The Opinions mainly encourages the Chinese enterprises to seize the opportunities under RECP to further promote their trade and investment.  

The Opinions touches upon the following aspects:

  1. Encourage Chinese enterprises to utilize the lower-tariff commitment of RCEP member countries, promoting the export of high-quality products;
  2. Encourage Chinese enterprises to make full use of the regional cumulative effects in the origins and provide guidance for them to use the facilitation measures including the declaration of origin;
  3. Accelerate the mutual recognition of the Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) and cooperation with RECP member countries;
  4. Improve the domestic intellectual property protection mechanism in accordance with the RECP IP rules and promote accession to international treaties regarding IP protection;
  5. Promote the e-commerce platforms to globalize their operations and improve the construction of global e-commerce infrastructure such as warehousing, logistics and e-payment; and,
  6. Promote the settlements in RMB for trade and investment within the RECP regions.

The RCEP entered into force on 1 Jan. 2022 for six ASEAN members including Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam, as well as four non-ASEAN members including China, Japan, New Zealand and Australia.

 

 

Cover Photo by 孙 铭泽 on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.