China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Judicial Interpretation of Administrative Compensation

Tue, 26 Apr 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the judicial interpretation, together with reference cases, concerning the trial of administrative compensation cases, ensuring that aggrieved parties may lodge lawsuits against administrative organs if they are dissatisfied with administrative compensation.

On 21 Mar. 2022, the SPC issued the “Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Administrative Compensation Cases” (hereinafter “the Judicial Interpretation of Administrative Compensation”, 关于审理行政赔偿案件若干问题的规定), which shall come into effect on 1 May 2022.

The Judicial Interpretation of Administrative Compensation contains 33 articles.

According to the Interpretation, a compensation claimant may file an administrative compensation lawsuit against the following acts of the administrative organ liable for compensation:

(1)Making the administrative compensation decision to determine the compensation method, item, and amount;

(2) Making the decision not to make compensation;

(3) Making no decision to make compensation within the prescribed time limit; or

(4) Other acts on administrative compensation.

 

 

Cover Photo by vigor poodo on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)