China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Judicial Interpretation to Counter Wildlife Crime

Mon, 09 May 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 7 Apr. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) jointly issued the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Destruction of Wildlife Resources” (《关于办理破坏野生动物资源刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》, hereinafter referred to as the “Interpretation”).

This Interpretation is aimed at addressing the rampant wildlife damage in China. For now, the crime of destroying wildlife resources has formed a profit chain of “poaching and trafficking”. Therefore, the judicial authority considers it necessary to stamp out not only the initial “poaching” section, but also the follow-up “trafficking” chain.

The promulgation of the Interpretation has reinforced the crackdown on wildlife crime.

It stipulates that anyone who purchases or sells aquatic products or wild animals obtained through illegal fishing or hunting shall be convicted of and punished for the crime of covering up or concealing criminal proceeds

It also clarifies the standards on conviction and sentencing for a newly-added crime in the Amendment (XI) to the Criminal Law, namely the crime of illegally hunting, purchasing, transporting, and selling terrestrial wildlife for food purposes.

 

 

Cover Photo by Sergio Capuzzimati on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.