China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues New Rules on Compensation for Environmental Damage

Mon, 27 Jun 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 26 Apr. 2022, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Prosecutor, and 11 other departments jointly issued the “Administrative Provisions on Compensation for Environmental Damage” (《生态环境损害赔偿管理规定》, hereinafter referred to as the “Provisions”).

Prior to that, China had released the “Plan for the Pilot Reform of the Compensation System for Environmental Damage” (《生态环境损害赔偿制度改革试点方案》)and the “Plan for the Reform of the Compensation System for Environmental Damage” (《生态环境损害赔偿制度改革方案》)(hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Plans”) in 2015 and 2017 respectively.

These two Plans have preliminarily established a nationwide compensation system for environmental damage. Based on that, the new Provisions aims to further specify and improve the norms of environmental damage compensation.

The Provisions consists of five chapters: General Provisions, Task Allocation, Working Procedures, Guarantee Mechanism, and Supplemental Provisions, adding up to 38 articles.

According to the Provisions, environmental damage can be categorized into two types: repairable damage and irreparable damage.

For the reparable damage, the compensation obligor shall restore the environment to the baseline level before the damage occurs or to an acceptable level of ecological risk.

For the irreparable damage, the compensation obligor shall compensate for the ecological losses and related costs or adopt alternatives to achieve equal restoration of the ecological environment and its service functions.

 

 

Cover Photo by liu sicheng on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.