China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Procedural Rules for Cyber Law Enforcement

Mon, 08 May 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 23 Mar. 2023, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) released the “Provisions on Administrative Law Enforcement Procedures of Cyberspace Administrations” (hereinafter the “Provisions”, 网信部门行政执法程序规定).

Cyberspace administrations refer to the CAC and local cyberspace administrations. Cyberspace administrations shall comply with the Provisions when implementing administrative penalties and other administrative law enforcement.

The Provisions comprises 58 articles, the highlights of which are as follows:

  • The law enforcement procedures of the cyberspace administrations are divided into multiple steps including filing, investigation and evidence collection, review, decision, service, and enforcement.
  • The party concerned shall have the right to be heard and the right to defense, as well as the right to apply for administrative reconsideration and file an administrative lawsuit.
  • The party concerned may apply for a hearing before the cyberspace administration makes a decision on the administrative penalty.

 

 

Cover Photo by Richard Tao on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.