China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Issues Rules to Implement Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs

Mon, 06 Jun 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 22 Apr. 2022, China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) issued the “Interim Measures of Related Provisions after China’s Accession to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs” (关于加入<海牙协定>后相关业务处理暂行办法, hereinafter “the Interim Measures”).

The Interim Measures clarifies that from 5 May 2022, Chinese entities or individuals may, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph two of Article 19 of the Patent Law, and in accordance with the “Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs” (1999 Act), file an application for international registration of the industrial design. An applicant may directly file an application for international registration of industrial design with the International Bureau of WIPO, or submit an application for international registration of the industrial design in English to the International Bureau through CNIPA.

Earlier this year, China deposited its instrument of accession to the “Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs” (1999 Act) with WIPO in February, becoming the 68th Contracting Party to the Agreement. The Agreement came into force in China on 5 May 2022.

The Hague System is a fast-track route to securing international protection of designs in multiple jurisdictions. Under the Hague System, an applicant can register an industrial design in multiple countries by filing a single application with WIPO, without having to file multiple applications for registration at multiple national or regional intellectual property offices. This avoids the complexity with diverse languages and different currencies.

 

 

Cover Photo by ruddy.media on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.