China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Promotes ADR in Administrative Disputes

Fri, 25 Feb 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 19 Jan. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Opinions on Further Promoting the Diversified Resolution of Administrative Disputes” (hereinafter “the Opinions”, 关于进一步推进行政争议多元化解工作的意见).

The Opinions mainly regulates how people’s courts should conduct mediations in administrative disputes. The highlights are summarized as follows.

A) After cases are brought to the people’s courts, the courts shall ask the plaintiff for the cause and background information and assess its risk accordingly.

On this basis, the courts could navigate the plaintiff in choosing appropriate non-litigation resolutions.

B) As for the cases involving administrative compensation and cases in which the administrative organ exercises discretionary power under laws and regulations, if the case is difficult to judge, the court may guide the plaintiff to pre-litigation mediation before the case filing process.

For example, this could apply to the situations when the plaintiff’s action is difficult to enforce, or the administrative dispute is triggered by deep-seated reasons such as misunderstanding of legal norms or emotional confrontation between the parties, or the dispute may affect social stability and thus could be difficult to be resolved by administrative adjudication alone.

 

Cover Photo by Xianyu hao on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.