China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Promotes ADR in Administrative Disputes

Fri, 25 Feb 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 19 Jan. 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued the “Opinions on Further Promoting the Diversified Resolution of Administrative Disputes” (hereinafter “the Opinions”, 关于进一步推进行政争议多元化解工作的意见).

The Opinions mainly regulates how people’s courts should conduct mediations in administrative disputes. The highlights are summarized as follows.

A) After cases are brought to the people’s courts, the courts shall ask the plaintiff for the cause and background information and assess its risk accordingly.

On this basis, the courts could navigate the plaintiff in choosing appropriate non-litigation resolutions.

B) As for the cases involving administrative compensation and cases in which the administrative organ exercises discretionary power under laws and regulations, if the case is difficult to judge, the court may guide the plaintiff to pre-litigation mediation before the case filing process.

For example, this could apply to the situations when the plaintiff’s action is difficult to enforce, or the administrative dispute is triggered by deep-seated reasons such as misunderstanding of legal norms or emotional confrontation between the parties, or the dispute may affect social stability and thus could be difficult to be resolved by administrative adjudication alone.

 

Cover Photo by Xianyu hao on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)