China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Proposes Medical Services Pricing Reform and Plan for Universal Healthcare Security

Mon, 08 Nov 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 23 Sept. 2021, the General Office of the State Council issued the “14th Five-year Plan for Universal Medical Security” (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”, “十四五”全民医疗保障规划), which is the first five-year plan in the field of medical security in China.

The Plan sets the objectives that by 2025, the medical security system will be more mature and finalized, and reform tasks in important mechanisms such as payment from the medical insurance fund, and supervision of funds as well as in key fields such as the supply of medical services and management of medical insurance will have been basically completed.

Previously, China's National Healthcare Security Administration and other seven authorities released in September the “Pilot Plan for Deepening Medical Service Pricing Reform” (hereinafter referred to as the “Pilot Plan”, 深化医疗服务价格改革试点方案), and designated five cities for the pilot reform.

The Pilot Plan clarifies to explore ways to improve the control of total volume, the price classification, dynamic price adjustment, etc. Under the pricing classification mechanism, the prices of general items generally carried out by hospitals will be controlled by the government; the prices of complex items with big difficulties and with major differences will be led by the government in cooperation with multiple parties, and the prices of public hospital services will be formed within the given total volume and rules.

 

 

Cover Photo by James Wheeler on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.