China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Protects Consumers against Unfair Standard Terms

Tue, 01 Aug 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 18 May 2023, China’s State Administration for Market Regulatory issued the “Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Contracts” (hereinafter the “Measures”, 合同行政监督管理办法).

The highlights of the Measures are as follows.

  • An operator entering into a contract with a consumer by using standard contract terms shall draw the consumer’s attention to the goods’ or services’ quantity and quality, price or cost, time and method of performance, safety precautions and risk warnings, after-sales service, civil liability and other contents of major interest to the consumer by separate notice, bold font, pop-up window, and other significant means, and make an explanation as required by consumers.
  • When an operator concludes a contract with a consumer, it should not mitigate or exempt its liability by utilizing standard clauses or other means. For instance, an operator may not exempt or mitigate its legal liability for causing personal injury to a consumer.
  • When entering into a contract with a consumer, an operator should not set forth provisions to increase the liability of consumers or to exclude or limit the rights of consumers by utilizing standard terms or other means. For instance, an operator may not specify in the contract that it has the unilateral or final right of interpretation.

 

Photo by Sakura on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.