China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Reforms Independent Director System of Listed Companies

Mon, 19 Jun 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 14 Apr. 2023, the General Office of China’s State Council issued the “Opinions on the Reform of Independent Director System of Listed Companies” (hereinafter the “Opinions”, 关于上市公司独立董事制度改革的意见).

In China, more often than not, the independent director of a listed company is not independent from the management of the company, or lacks the professional ability to perform the director’s duties, or lacks the power to effectively supervise the company.

Consequently, independent directors in China are unable to play their proper supervisory role. That’s why Chinese investors often have doubts about independent directors.

Therefore, the Chinese government released the aforementioned Opinions to change the status quo on independent directors.

Highlights of the Opinions are summarized below:

  • The board of directors of a listed company shall establish an audit committee whose members are all non-executive directors and in which independent directors are the majority;
  • An independent director shall not have any interest in the listed company or any of its principal shareholders and actual controllers;
  • A periodic independence testing and disclosure mechanism shall be established to ensure that independent directors continue to perform their duties independently;
  • Persons with extensive industrial experience, experience in business operations and management, expertise in financial accounting, finance, law and other fields, and high reputation in the fields in which they are engaged are encouraged to serve as independent directors.

 

 

Cover Photo by vigor poodo on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.