China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Regulates Overseas Loans of Banking Financial Institutions

Mon, 25 Oct 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

The People's Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange issued the proposed “Provisions on Issues Concerning Overseas Loan Business of Banking Financial Institutions” (Draft for Public Comment) (hereinafter “the Provisions”, 关于银行业金融机构境外贷款业务有关事宜的规定(征求意见稿)), and gather public opinions from 18 Sept. 2021 to 3 Oct. 2021.

According to the Provisions, overseas loan business refers to the act of domestic banks with the capacity of international settlement business, within their approved business scope, to directly grant loans in CNY and foreign currencies to overseas enterprises, or indirectly grant loans in CNY and foreign currencies for more than one year to overseas enterprises by providing funds to overseas banks or otherwise, excluding trade financing in actual cross-border trade settlements handled by banks.

The Provisions puts the overseas CNY loan and foreign exchange loan business under a unified policy framework and encourages domestic banks to provide overseas loans in domestic currency. According to the Provisions, domestic banks can directly provide overseas CNY loans to overseas enterprises within their approved business scope, and the entities eligible for the provision of overseas loans are no longer limited to "going out" projects. As for the loan providing method, domestic banks may provide medium- and long-term funds to overseas banks for more than one year in accordance with the need to handle overseas loans.

 

 

Cover Photo by Andy Guan (https://unsplash.com/@andygp) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.