China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Releases Anti-Monopoly Law Enforcement Report (2022)

Mon, 27 Mar 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 9 Feb. 2023, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation and its subordinate State Anti-Monopoly Bureau reported the anti-monopoly law enforcement in 2022 at a conference.

The conference refers to the “Antitrust Work Conference of the National Market Regulation System” (全国市场监管系统反垄断工作会议) held in Qingdao.

In 2022, the highlights of China’s anti-monopoly law enforcement activities include:

  • China has concluded 187 monopoly cases with total fines of CNY 784 million.
  • China has concluded 794 cases involving the concentration of business operators, five of which were granted conditional approval.
  • The Anti-Monopoly Law was revised for the first time since its promulgation 15 years ago.

 

 

Cover Photo by Zhenzhi Mao on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)