China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Releases Implementing Rules for Fair Competition Review

Tue, 10 Aug 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 8 July 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) and other four authorities jointly released the “Implementing Rules for the Fair Competition Review” (the “Implementing Rules”, 公平竞争审查制度实施细则), refining and improving the rules for the fair-competition review system.

Pursuant to the Implementing Rules, administrative organs and organizations authorized by laws and regulations to have the authority of public affairs administration shall conduct the fair-competition review in the formulation of rules, normative documents, and other policies concerning economic activities of market players, such as market access and exit, industrial development, investment promotion, tendering and bidding, government procurement, code of business conduct, and qualification standards, as well as specific policy measures on “case-by-case” basis.

Specific reviewing criteria stipulated in the Implementation Rules include :(1) prohibiting the setting up of unreasonable or discriminatory barriers for market access and exit; (2) prohibiting the granting of franchise rights to operators without fair competition; (3) disallowing to restrict the operation, purchase or use of commodities and services provided by specific operators; (4) prohibiting the establishment of examination and approval procedure or record-filing procedure with the nature of administrative examination and approval that is not subject to laws, administrative regulations or provisions of the State Council; and (5) prohibiting the setting up of approval procedures for industries, sectors, businesses, etc. that are not on the Negative List for Market Access.

The Implementing Rules shall come into force as of the date of promulgation, and the “Implementing Rules for the Fair Competition Review (for Interim Implementation)” (公平竞争审查制度实施细则(暂行)) shall be repealed simultaneously.

 

 

Cover Photo by Jerry Wang (https://unsplash.com/@jerry_318) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)