China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Releases Typical Cases of National Consumer’s Rights Protection(2021-2022)

Thu, 08 Jun 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On World Consumer Rights Day, 15 Mar. 2023, China Consumers Association (CCA) released “Ten Typical Judicial Cases of National Consumers Rights Protection” in 2021-2022.

In one of the cases, the court held that, in e-commerce, consumers’ ratings and reviews on merchants based on comprehensive factors such as whether the goods or services themselves are consistent with the description of the online shop and the seller’s service attitude are subjective to a certain extent and the words may be relatively fierce or even unfair. Still, as long as they are not to maliciously discredit the business reputation, “negative feedback” by consumers is not insulting and defamatory and generally does not constitute infringement.

In another case where Amazon was sued by a consumer, the court held that a standard choice of forum clause (jurisdiction clause) provided by Amazon excludes the jurisdiction of the consumer’s domicile, and deprives the consumer of the right to choose the place of litigation, thereby unreasonably restricting the consumer’s rights. Therefore, such a jurisdiction clause was null and void.

 

 

Cover Photo by Peijia Li on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.