China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Releases Typical Cases of Overtime Labor Disputes

Mon, 14 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and the Chinese government have given the red card to the 996 working hour system and other serious overtime in the workplace.

In August 2021, the SPC and the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (hereinafter “the Authorities”) jointly released ten typical cases of overtime disputes, clarifying the standards of the application of law regarding disputed issues like the working hour system, overtime payment, and workers’ rights to breaks and vacation.

In one of the typical cases, the Authorities clarified that the 996 Mode refers to working from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. for six days a week, which seriously violates the law regarding the regulation of the maximum extension of working hours, and therefore should be deemed invalid.

Currently, a serious overtime working system is commonly seen in manufacturing and high-tech industries. Although it is illegal, many companies have adopted the 996 working hour system as common practice.

The Chinese judiciary and labor regulatory authorities are trying to correct this anomaly.

 

 

Cover Photo by Andrew Neel on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.