China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s E-Filing Surpasses Half of First-Instance Cases in 2020

Mon, 25 Oct 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 24 Aug. 2021, China’s Supreme People's Court (SPC) published the “Evaluation Report on Effects of Building Intelligent Courts to Promote Green Development (hereinafter “the Report”, 建设智慧法院促进绿色发展成效评估报告), introducing achievements made by intelligent courts in reducing people's litigation fatigue, improving work quality and efficiency, and promoting green development.

According to the Report, intelligent courts have greatly facilitated case filing and reduced travel costs through the implementation of electronic litigation. In terms of online case filing (E-filing), the courts at all levels nationwide accepted the online filing of 10.8 million cases in 2020, accounting for 54% of the first-instance cases. Over 20% of applications for case filing were submitted during non-working hours, and about 10% of applications for case filing were submitted on non-working days.

According to the actual application effects of users, under ideal conditions, a party concerned can complete the application for case filing through the online litigation service platform in 20 minutes.

Compared with the traditional way of on-site case filing by offline courts, courts at all levels nationwide could help the parties, lawyers and other litigation participants reduce travel by 2.45 billion kilometers and save travel costs by about CNY 1.59 billion in 2020, equivalent to saving 80 thousand tons of standard coal and reducing carbon emissions by 163 thousand tons.

 

 

Cover Photo by Jessica Holmes (https://unsplash.com/@iameow) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.