China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Industrial Associations Warns of NFT-Related Financial Risks

Wed, 10 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 13 Apr. 2022, the National Internet Finance Association of China, China Banking Association, and Securities Association of China jointly issued an Initiative to prevent financial risks related to non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

China’s NFT market has been heating up in recent years. As an innovative application of blockchain technology, NFTs are accompanied by potential risks of speculation, money laundering, and other illegal financial activities.

The Initiative seeks to curb any financialization and securitization tendency of NFTs and strictly prevent the risk of illegal financial activities. It proposes the following six codes of compliance conduct:

(1) Not to include financial assets (e.g., securities, insurance, loans, and precious metals) in any underlying asset of NFTs, i.e., not to use NFTs in the issuance and trade of any financial product.

(2) Not to undermine the NFT’s non-fungibility through methods like dividing the ownership or creating batches, i.e., not to facilitate initial coin offering (ICO) covertly;

(3) Not to provide centralized trading (centralized bidding, electronic aggregation, anonymous trading, market makers, etc.), continuous listing transactions, standardized contract trading, and other services for NFT trade, i.e., not to set up any trading venues in violation of regulations.

(4) Not to use cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, ETH, and USDT in pricing or settling NFTs.

(5) To conduct real-name authentication for NFT issuers, buyers and sellers, properly keep customer identity information and issuance transaction records, and actively cooperate with anti-money laundering efforts.

(6) Not to invest in NFTs directly or indirectly, or provide any financing support for such investment.

 

 

Cover Photo by Yetepireg ILes on Unsplash

 
 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)