China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Industrial Associations Warns of NFT-Related Financial Risks

Wed, 10 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 13 Apr. 2022, the National Internet Finance Association of China, China Banking Association, and Securities Association of China jointly issued an Initiative to prevent financial risks related to non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

China’s NFT market has been heating up in recent years. As an innovative application of blockchain technology, NFTs are accompanied by potential risks of speculation, money laundering, and other illegal financial activities.

The Initiative seeks to curb any financialization and securitization tendency of NFTs and strictly prevent the risk of illegal financial activities. It proposes the following six codes of compliance conduct:

(1) Not to include financial assets (e.g., securities, insurance, loans, and precious metals) in any underlying asset of NFTs, i.e., not to use NFTs in the issuance and trade of any financial product.

(2) Not to undermine the NFT’s non-fungibility through methods like dividing the ownership or creating batches, i.e., not to facilitate initial coin offering (ICO) covertly;

(3) Not to provide centralized trading (centralized bidding, electronic aggregation, anonymous trading, market makers, etc.), continuous listing transactions, standardized contract trading, and other services for NFT trade, i.e., not to set up any trading venues in violation of regulations.

(4) Not to use cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, ETH, and USDT in pricing or settling NFTs.

(5) To conduct real-name authentication for NFT issuers, buyers and sellers, properly keep customer identity information and issuance transaction records, and actively cooperate with anti-money laundering efforts.

(6) Not to invest in NFTs directly or indirectly, or provide any financing support for such investment.

 

 

Cover Photo by Yetepireg ILes on Unsplash

 
 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.