China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Legal Professions Subject to Uniform Pre-Service Training

Mon, 18 Apr 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

The Chinese government, jointly with the judicial branch, issued new regulations requiring junior judges, prosecutors, legal arbitrators, lawyers, and notaries to participate in uniform pre-service training for practice.

Prior to the new regulations, pre-service training is conducted separately regarding different legal professions. But from now on, a new uniform pre-service training will be in service to help build a united professional community.

On 28 February 2022, the CPC Central Committee, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC), China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the “Guiding Opinions on Establishment of a Uniform Pre-service Training System for Legal Professions” (hereinafter “the Opinions”, 关于建立法律职业人员统一职前培训制度的指导意见).

The Opinions stipulates that pre-service training is required for junior judges, prosecutors, and legal arbitrators to apply to practice as lawyers or notaries. They are allowed to engage in relevant legal professions only upon qualification of the training.

The pre-service training mainly contains two stages: the centralized teaching phase and the comprehensive training phase involving occupational practice. Qualified training institutions or self-regulatory organizations in relevant industries are responsible for conducting specific pre-service training for legal professionals.

 

 

Cover Photo by Yu Gui on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.