China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s Legal Professions Subject to Uniform Pre-Service Training

Mon, 18 Apr 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

The Chinese government, jointly with the judicial branch, issued new regulations requiring junior judges, prosecutors, legal arbitrators, lawyers, and notaries to participate in uniform pre-service training for practice.

Prior to the new regulations, pre-service training is conducted separately regarding different legal professions. But from now on, a new uniform pre-service training will be in service to help build a united professional community.

On 28 February 2022, the CPC Central Committee, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC), China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the “Guiding Opinions on Establishment of a Uniform Pre-service Training System for Legal Professions” (hereinafter “the Opinions”, 关于建立法律职业人员统一职前培训制度的指导意见).

The Opinions stipulates that pre-service training is required for junior judges, prosecutors, and legal arbitrators to apply to practice as lawyers or notaries. They are allowed to engage in relevant legal professions only upon qualification of the training.

The pre-service training mainly contains two stages: the centralized teaching phase and the comprehensive training phase involving occupational practice. Qualified training institutions or self-regulatory organizations in relevant industries are responsible for conducting specific pre-service training for legal professionals.

 

 

Cover Photo by Yu Gui on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)