China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s First Public Interest Lawsuit on Cultural Heritage Protection Ruled

Mon, 10 Oct 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 30 Aug. 2022, the Jiujiang Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangxi Province (hereinafter the “Jiujiang Intermediate Court”) held a public hearing for a public interest lawsuit filed by the Jiujiang People’s Procuratorate against the defendant Chen for the protection of movable cultural relics. At the hearing, the Jiujiang Intermediate Court rendered the first-instance judgment, in which it required the defendant to bear the cost for cultural relics restoration (CNY 100,000) and the expert evaluation cost, and to publish an apology statement in the national media.

This is China’s first public-interest civil lawsuit involving the protection of movable cultural relics. For more information on Chinese procuratorates’ authority in public litigation, please read our previous post, “How China’s Procuratorates Conducts Public Interest Litigation?”.

In 2020, the defendant Chen excavated an antique bronze bell without permission and caused damage to it. In December 2021, Chen was sentenced to two years and five months in prison and fined CNY 20,000 for the illicit trafficking of cultural relics.

The Jiujiang Intermediate Court held those cultural relics, as the tangible remains of history, are of non-renewable and irreplaceable value to history, science, and art. In the court’s view, Chen’s damage to cultural relics had harmed the public interest, and therefore he should bear criminal and tort liability.

 

 

Cover Photo by Alessio Lin on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)