China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Sets up the International Commercial Court in Local Court - China Legal News

Fri, 20 Nov 2020
Categories: China Legal Trends

Suzhou Intermediate People's Court (苏州国际商事法庭)

 

According to the information disclosed by Suzhou Intermediate People's Court (苏州国际商事法庭) in its official media on 12 Nov. 2020, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) has approved it to establish Suzhou International Commercial Court. It is the first International Commercial Court set up in a local court. 

Back in June 2018, the SPC had established the China International Commercial Court (CICC) in itself, which renders its judgment on behalf of the SPC. However, as far as we know, the CICC has not accepted many cases due to the small scope of its jurisdiction.

Setting up an International Commercial Court within a local court in Suzhou, a city only 100 kilometers away from Shanghai, the SPC probably aims to accept more cases that are currently inadmissible to the CICC.

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)