China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China’s SPP Sets up the Intellectual Property Prosecution Office - China Legal News

Tue, 17 Nov 2020
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

On 6 Nov. 2020, The Supreme People's Procuratorate (最高人民检察院, SPP)’s Prosecutor General Zhang Jun (张军) claims that the SPP has set up a new institution, i.e. Intellectual Property Prosecution Office (知识产权检察办公室, IP Office).

The IP Office is mainly responsible for formulating strategic plans for the prosecution of intellectual property and guiding the people’s procuratorates nationwide to handle criminal, civil, and administrative cases of intellectual property infringement.

The powers of Chinese procuratorates include filing charges as a public prosecutor in criminal cases, as well as supervising civil and administrative cases heard by the courts.

As for the procuratorial powers, please refer to an earlier post of the CJO.

 

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.

Chinese Judgments Go Global: Emerging Systemic Challenges and Confidence Deficit

This post analyzes the historic rise in cross-border judgment enforcement involving China, specifically focusing on the persistent challenges hindering the recognition of Chinese judgments abroad. It identifies two primary obstacles—emerging legal hurdles regarding systemic due process and a "confidence deficit" among Chinese creditors—and argues that addressing these is essential to sustaining the framework of mutual recognition.