China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Strengthens Oversight of the Whole Chain of Ride-Hailing Services

Mon, 14 Mar 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

In February 2022, the Ministry of Transport and other seven departments jointly issued the revised “Notice on the Strengthening of Joint Supervision of the Whole Chain of Online Ride-Hailing Industry Including In-progress Rides and After-Journey Services” (hereinafter “the 2022 Notice”, 关于加强网络预约出租汽车行业事前事中事后全链条联合监管有关工作的通知).

The Notice is revised from its 2018 version, based on which regulation of the online hailing business is further tightened.

The 2022 Notice incorporates eight illegal activities into joint supervision, including:

  • online ride-hailing operators conducting unauthorized business activities without obtaining an online ride-hailing service license,
  • assigning business to drivers and vehicles that do not have a corresponding taxi permit,
  • failing to submit relevant data to an online ride-hailing information exchange platform run by the government,
  • infringing labor rights of platforms’ drivers, and
  • endangering public interest, disrupting social order, and impacting social safety and stability.

China’s ride-hailing giant has been subjected to unprecedentedly strict supervision following its IPO in July 2021. The 2022 Notice reflects the Chinese government’s latest approach to the online ride-hailing industry.

 

 

Cover Photo by Alexander Schimmeck on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.