China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Adjust Application of Criminal Procedure Law in Wartime

Mon, 17 Apr 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, China’s top legislature, authorizes China’s Central Military Commission (CMC) to adjust the application of the Criminal Procedure Law in wartime.

In terms of the military’s wartime criminal prosecution activities, the CMC can adjust some specific provisions of China’s Criminal Procedure Law regarding jurisdiction, defense and

representation, compulsory measures, filing, investigation, prosecution, trial, and execution.

On 24 Feb. 2023, the NPC Standing Committee adopted the “Decision on Adjusting the Application of Certain Provisions of China’s Criminal Procedure Law for the Military in Wartime” (关于军队战时调整适用<中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法>部分规定的决定), which introduces the above provision and aims to “legally ensure that the people's military effectively performs its mission and duties in the new era while improving its ability to win”.

 

 

Cover Photo by manos koutras on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)