China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Improve Public Interest Litigation for Marine Environment

Mon, 20 Jun 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 10 May 2022, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) jointly issued the “Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Handling of Public Interest Litigation Cases Involving Marine Natural Resources and Ecological Environment” (《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理海洋自然资源与生态环境公益诉讼案件若干问题的规定》, hereinafter referred to as the “Provisions”).

The Provisions aims to guide judges in handling public interest litigation cases involving damage to marine ecology, marine aquatic resources, and marine protected areas through civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings.

According to the Provisions, China’s procuratorates can file civil public interest lawsuits or civil lawsuits incidental to criminal public interest litigation against the responsible parties.

Procuratorates can also file administrative public interest lawsuits against law-enforcement agencies for failing to discharge their duties.

 

Related Posts:

How China’s Procuratorates Conduct Public Interest Litigation?

Don't Forget the People's Procuratorate When Resorting to China's Judicial System 

 

 

Cover Photo by Jeevan Katel on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)