China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Promote Mediation of Intellectual Property Disputes

Mon, 29 Nov 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

China is elevating the status of mediation in settling intellectual property disputes.

On 28 Oct. 2021, China National Intellectual Property Administration and Ministry of Justice jointly published the Opinions on Strengthening Mediation of Intellectual Property Disputes (hereinafter “the Opinions”, 关于加强知识产权纠纷调解工作的意见).

The Opinions calls for the engagement of people’s mediation, administrative mediation, professional/industry mediation, and court-connected mediation in intellectual property disputes. That’s how ADR can play an enhanced role in intellectual property dispute resolution. For more information on the types of mediation in China, see our previous article Mediation in China: Past and Present.

The Opinions proposes that professionals with work experience and knowledge in patents, trademarks and copyrights, as well as experts, scholars and lawyers, be selected and employed as mediators.

 

 

Cover Photo by Joshua Fernandez on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)