China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Regulate Automotive Data Security

Wed, 22 Sep 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

In August 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, and the Ministry of Transport jointly issued the “Provisions on the Administration of Automotive Data Security (for Trial Implementation)” (hereinafter “the Provisions”, 汽车数据安全管理若干规定(试行)). The Provisions will come into force on 1 Oct. 2021.

The Provisions is aimed at regulating automotive data processing activities, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of individuals and organizations, safeguarding national security and social public interests, and promoting the reasonable development and utilization of automotive data as well.

The Provisions clarifies the following requirements for the processing of personal information: (1) Notification obligation. The automotive data processor, when processing personal information, shall inform the individuals of the type of personal information to be processed, the scenario for collection, the methods for ceasing the information collection, and other relevant information. (2) The obligation to obtain consent. The automotive data processor shall obtain the consent of the individual or be in line with other circumstances in accordance with laws and administrative regulations. (3) Anonymity requirement. Where the personal information collected is provided to others without the individual's consent for guaranteeing driving safety, the personal information that has been collected shall be anonymized.

In view of sensitive personal information, on the basis of performing the obligations of notification and obtaining the individual's separate consent, the automotive data processor shall also meet the specific requirements to define the purpose of processing, remind the individual of the collection status, and facilitate the individual to terminate the collection. In terms of biometric information such as fingerprints, voiceprints, facial information, and heart rhythms, no automotive data processor may collect such information only if it is deemed necessary to do so to enhance driving safety.

 

 

Cover Photo by Joshua Fernandez (https://unsplash.com/@joshuafernandez) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)