China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Regulate Inspection and Testing System

Mon, 03 Jan 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 22 Nov. 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation issued the proposed amendments of the “Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Certification and Accreditation (Draft for Comments)” (hereinafter “the Regulations”, 中华人民共和国认证认可条例) for public opinions through 22 Dec. 2021.

Certification and accreditation as well as inspection and testing are the fundamental basis to strengthen quality management and improve market efficiency under a market economy.

The Regulations is currently the only individual law regulating the activities of certification and accreditation as well as inspection and testing. This amendment is the first comprehensive revision of the Regulations since its release in August 2003.

In contrast with the original version, this draft Regulations includes a new chapter of “inspection and testing”, combining it with certification and accreditation, resulting in a uniform assessment system.  

It mainly clarifies the assessment system for the qualifications of the establishment of inspection and testing agencies, as well as their qualifications, basic code of conduct, report requirements, and the details of its establishment or authorization by administrative authorities.

 

 

Cover Photo by Xiaoyang Ou on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

Guangdong High Court Highlights Landmark Mainland-Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ruling

Among 10 typical cases released by the Guangdong High People's Court to advance legal alignment in the Greater Bay Area, a landmark ruling (Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation) stands out for securing Hong Kong judicial recognition for a bankruptcy administrator appointed by a mainland court outside designated pilot regions.

China Publishes First Typical Cases in Sports Arbitration

China Commission of Arbitration for Sports (CCAS) has released its first set of six typical cases, establishing a precedent, among others, that sports agency contract disputes fall under specialized sports arbitration rather than general commercial arbitration.

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)