China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Strengthen Governance of Algorithms

Thu, 28 Oct 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 29 Sept. 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Publicity Department of the CPC Central Committee and other seven authorities jointly released the “Guiding Opinions on Strengthening the Comprehensive Governance of the Internet Information Service Algorithms” (hereinafter “the Guiding Opinions”, 关于加强互联网信息服务算法综合治理的指导意见). The Guiding Opinions plans to gradually establish the pattern of comprehensive governance of algorithmic security in about three years.

In terms of algorithmic governance, the Guiding Opinions stresses the need to further clarify the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of the government, enterprises, industrial organizations and netizens in the governance of algorithm security, and strengthens the entity responsibilities of enterprises and the self-regulation of industrial organizations.

In terms of the supervision over algorithm security, the Guiding Opinions requires competent authorities to monitor algorithm security risks, carry out algorithm security evaluation, and promote the recordation of algorithms.

With regard to the ecological development of algorithms, the Guiding Opinions promotes the openness and transparency of algorithms, encourages the innovative development of algorithms, prevents the risk of algorithm abuse, and maintains the transmission order, market order, and social order in cyberspace.

 

 

Cover Photo by Li Zhang (https://unsplash.com/@sunx) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (hereafter ‘PRC’) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.