China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Court Confirms Company Managers’ Duty in Preventing Workplace Sexual Harassment

Mon, 15 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 6 July 2022, China’s Supreme People’s Court released the 32nd batch of guiding cases, mainly on the protection of workers’ legitimate rights and interests.

A total of seven guiding cases were released this time, involving disputes on unpaid salaries, non-competition, and equal employment opportunities.

In Guiding Case No. 181 Zheng v. Honeywell Automation and Control Solutions (China) Co., Ltd., the court clarified that managers of the employer were obliged to stop or prevent sexual harassment in the workplace.

More specifically, the court held that managers should take reasonable measures in response to the complaints of employees who were sexually harassed.

In other words, where a manager fails to take reasonable measures against sexual harassment, condones the harassment, or even interferes in the investigation of such behavior, the employer can legally terminate the labor contract with the manager on the grounds that the manager failed to perform job duties and severely violated the company’s rules and regulations.

 

 

Cover Photo by Demi He on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)

IOMed Settles First Case, Resolving China-Singapore Maritime Dispute

The newly established International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) has successfully resolved its inaugural case—a maritime charter dispute between Chinese and Singaporean parties—marking a major milestone for the world’s first government-backed global mediation body.

China Overhauls Arbitration Law for Global Alignment

Having entered into force on March 1, 2026, China’s first comprehensive revision of its 1995 Arbitration Law has introduced ad hoc arbitration, strengthened interim relief, and aligned the legal framework more closely with international standards.