China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Court Delivers First Instance Judgment on YYeTs Copyright Infringement Case

Wed, 29 Dec 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

In November 2021, the operator of China’s Largest Fansub Group YYeTs Liang was sentenced to prison for copyright infringement.

On 22 Nov. 2021, Shanghai No.3 Intermediate People’s Court held a public hearing on the case of the defendant Liang, who was accused of committing copyright infringement and was prosecuted by Shanghai No.3 People’s Procuratorate.

The Court has delivered the first instance judgment, sentencing defendant Liang Yongping to three years and six months in prison as well as a punitive fine for copyright infringement.

The Court found that, since 2018, the defendant Liang has established two tech companies and provided users with online streaming and downloading services of unauthorized film and TV on Renren Yingshi (YYeTs.com) and other related platforms.

The Court held that the defendant Liang has reproduced and distributed other people’s works for profit without the permission of the copyright owner, and that the illegal revenue totaled more than CNY 12 million (approx. USD 1.878 million). Therefore, his behavior was considered as aggravating circumstances.

Ultimately, the Court held that his actions constituted a copyright infringement.

 

 

Cover Photo by xiaokang Zhang on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

China Designates Beijing Court for ICSID Arbitral Awards

China has officially designated the Beijing No. 4 Intermediate People's Court to handle the recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards, filling a long-standing procedural gap and advancing its restrictive immunity framework.

PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal, Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments

Recent Australian case law clarifies that the “double interest” mechanism in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) monetary judgments functions as a compensatory post-judgment interest framework rather than an unenforceable penalty. This consolidates Australia’s position as a highly attractive and creditor-friendly forum for enforcing Chinese judgments. See Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58 (6 February 2024), Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597 (16 September 2025)